Wet Wonder Glue

Mussel

With few exceptions, water is the nemesis of adhesive bonding, at least of commercial adhesives. Not only does it prevent robust surface bonding by polymers, but water can wick into and disrupt interfaces engineered under the best clean-room conditions. How then can mussels Mytilus (Picture 8) and sandcastle worms Phragmatopoma (Picture 9) attach and stay attached to hard surfaces in the sea? Most adhesives rely on a combination of noncovalent interactions with surface groups and mechanical interlocking with surface roughness to stick. Common interactions include salt bridges, H-bonds and van der Waals. These are largely compromised by the dielectric constant of the water (approximately 80) as exemplified by Coulomb's law.

The structural architecture of mussel and worm adhesives is foam-like with a thin cuticular coating (Picture 10). Moreover, in the case of mussel byssus, collagen fibers from the thread core are deeply rooted in the foam. One hypothesis to account for the success of marine invertebrate adhesives is that they rely more heavily on interfacial interactions that are not governed by the dielectric of the medium. We have used laser desorption techniques to interrogate the footprints of adhesive plaques (Picture 11) and have discovered two families of proteins that contain up to 30 mol% 3, 4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (dopa). Dopa has long been implicated in quinone-tanning, thus its role in cross-linking and consequent cohesion is well established. The high levels of uncross-linked dopa in mfp-3 and -5 at the adhesive interface were unexpected and suggest another, different activity. Other common residues in these proteins are glycine, asparagine and lysine.

To explore the role of dopa, the Messersmith group at Northwestern University recently tethered single Dopa residues to AFM cantilever tips and observed that the energy to break tip-tethered Dopa from a titanium oxide surface in water was about 130 kJ/mol, which is much higher than any noncovalent interaction. The interaction of Dopa with TiO2 appears to be a charge-transfer complex or coordinate bond.

Research Collaborators

Related Publications
McDowell, L. M., Burzio, L.A., Waite, J. H., and Schaefer, J. (1999) REDOR Detection of crosslinks formed in mussel byssus under high flow stress. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 20293-20295.
Floriolli, R. Y., von Langen, J., and Waite, J. H. (2000) Marine surfaces and the expression of specific byssal adhesive protein variants in Mytilus. Mar. Biotech 2, 352-363.
Burzio, L.A. and Waite, J. H. (2000) Cross-linking in adhesive quinoproteins: Studies with model decapeptides. Biochemistry 39, 11147-11153.
Harder, P., Grunze, M. and Waite, J. H. (2000) Interaction of the adhesive protein mefp-1 and fibrinogen with methyl and oligo(ethylene glycol) terminated self- assembled monolayers. J. Adhesion 73, 161-177.
Waite, J. H., and Qin, X.-X. (2001) Polyphenolic phosphoprotein from the adhesive pads of the common mussel. Biochemistry 40, 2887-2893.
Stewart, R. J., Weaver, J. C., Morse, D. E., and Waite, J. H. (2004) The tube cement of Phragmatopoma californica: a solid foam. J. Exp. Biol. 207, 4727-4734.
Waite, J.H., Holten-Andersen, N., Jewhurst, S., Sun, C.J. (2005) Mussel Adhesion: Finding the Tricks Worth Mimicking. Journal of Adhesion, 81, 297-317.
Zhao, H., Sun, C.-J. Stewart, R. J., and Waite, J.H. (2005) Cement proteins of the tube building polychaete Phragmatopoma californica. J. Biol. Chem. in press