REPORT OF THE
THIRD MEETING OF THE STEERING COMMITTEE
OF THE
TETRAHYMENA GENOME PROJECT
Saxtons River,
VT, July 31, 2001
Prepared by E. Orias - 8-20-01
The Steering Committee had its third meeting on July 31, 2001, in conjunction with the FASEB International Conference on Ciliate Molecular Biology.
ACTIONS
TAKEN:
-
We will proceed to activate the process to submit an NIH proposal to initially
sequence, finish and annotate the Tetrahymena thermophila MAC genome. The
application process is described below.
-
We will explore the possibility of initially linking with an existing database,
as possibly the most useful and cost affective elternative, at least in the
short term.
-
We will do everything we can to ensure that the project and the database
benefit the entire ciliate community.
-
Since we expect that the benefits of the Tetrahymena genome project will be
broad, we plan to explore as many alternative funding sources as possible.
THE
NIH APPLICATION PROCESS.
1.
We must first submit a concept paper justifying the genome project and
projecting its costs. The issues that we must address are given at http://www.nih.gov/science/models/process/index.html
I
will coordinate the efforts of a group of investigators, listed further below,
who will collate information on the significance of having a genome project to
the research areas of their expertise. We aim to have the concept paper ready
for submission by Oct. 1.
2.
The concept paper will be reviewed by the Trans-NIH Non-Mammalian Models
Committee. This Committee includes representatives from all the NIH Institutes,
as well as NSF, USDA, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, and perhaps others. You
can read about it at http://www.nih.gov/science/models/reports/ccnmm_staff_contacts.html
3.
Contingent upon feedback from the Non-Mammalian Models Committee, we plan to
submit a full-fledged application at the earliest possible date, hopefully by
Jan 1, 2002.
We will keep you informed of the progress of our application as it moves through the process.
We
want the genome project to be responsive to the needs and aspirations of the
entire Ciliate research community. Many of you have asked how you could be of
help. Here are some areas in which your help could be very useful:
1)
By submitting a concisely written paragraph that describes how having genome
sequence (and downstream resources) would help address important research
problems in your area of expertise, particularly if you think that the area is
unlikely to be sufficiently covered by the topics listed below. Suggested
guidelines are given in the Appendix below.
2)
By alerting me to any of your new findings, accepted papers, or funded grants
that have direct application to the genomic effort, e.g., that generate new
tools or resources that strengthen our application and enhance the prospects
for productive downstream use of Tetrahymena genome sequence.
3)
By sending to me a list of the most useful information that you would like to
see in the database, so that it could be of greatest help not just to the
ciliate community, but also to the outside research community in your area of
interest.
4)
By alerting me to experience you may have and willingness to help in the
"informatics" area, e.g., website management, database organization
and management, systematizing information, annotation, etc.
5)
By alerting me to any funding sources that could reasonably be approached to
help support the sequencing project, with specific information that would
facilitate contacts with these agencies or companies.
PRESENT
AT THE STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING:
David
Asai, Cliff Brunk, Peter Bruns, Ted Clark, Jean Cohen, Kathy Collins, Jacek
Gaertig, Marty Gorovsky, Carolyn Jahn, Jeff Kapler, Kathy Karrer, Larry
Klobutcher, Laura Landweber, Ed Orias, Ron Pearlman, Aaron Turkewitz.
Unable
to attend: Ching Kung and Linda Sperling.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS:
I would like to express my thanks to the speakers in the Mapping and Genomics Session and in the Genomics Workshop at the FASEB meeting; to members of the Steering Committee and the meeting organizers for their excellent help, support and advice; to Bill Gelbart (Harvard University) and Jonathan Eisen (TIGR) for speaking in our Genomics Workshop and sharing with us their insights derived from participation in completed genome sequencing projects; and to Tony Carter (Director of the Division of Genetics and Developmental Biology at the National Institute of General Medical Sciences and NIH contact person for the Tetrahymena genome project) for attending the FASEB meeting, explaining to us the NIH process for genomic grant applications and alerting us to areas of the concept paper that must be thoroughly documented..
Of
special value would be demonstrated accomplishments and/or specific findings
indicating clear promise of applicability that would be of interest to agencies
supporting research with diverse missions, e.g., fundamental biology (NIH and
NSF), NIH disease institutes, US Department of Agriculture, Environmental
Protection Agency, Department of Energy, pharmaceutical/biotech industry,
philanthropic foundations, etc.
The
significance of the Tetrahymena genome sequence is expected to cover a variety
of areas, such as:
-
Fundamental biology (cellular, molecular, developmental, physiological,
behavioral, evolutionary, ecological, environmental, etc.)
-
Medicine and public health
-
Surrogate animal research
-
Biotech & pharmaceutical research & drug testing
-
Monitoring environmental quality
-
Other areas not listed here that you may be keenly aware of.
If
you would like to submit a statement, please:
-
Include a limited number of key references in your statement: to a good review,
if possible, or to primary research paper(s), if not.
-
Don't hesitate to indicate cases where findings in other ciliates strengthen
the contributions and promise of the Tetrahymena genomic sequence.
-
For the purposes of the application, contributions of other Tetrahymena
species, e.g., T. pyriformis, should be treated as interchangeable with those
of T. thermophila.
-
Send your contribution directly to me, as soon as possible; your contribution
will be of greatest usefulness if sent by Sept 1.
INVESTIGATORS THAT HAVE SUBMITTED OR HAVE AGREED TO SUBMIT STATEMENTS IN VARIOUS AREAS OF THE CONCEPT PAPER:
-
Cilia & Cytoskeleton: Jacek Gaertig and David Asai,
jgaertig@CB.UGA.EDU,
dasai@BILBO.BIO.PURDUE.EDU
-
Ecology & Evolution: Laura Landweber and Ron Pearlman,
lfl@PRINCETON.EDU,
ronp@YORKU.CA
-
Chromatin, nuclei & apoptosis:
Marty Gorovsky,
-
Replication, Recombination, Repair: Jeff Kapler, gkapler@TAMU.EDU
-
Protein targeting: Aaron Turkewitz, apturkew@MIDWAY.UCHICAGO.EDU
-
Phagocytosis & Bacterial pathogenesis: Larry Klobutcher,
-
Telomeres: Kathy Collins, collins@MENDEL.BERKELEY.EDU
-
DNA rearrangements: Larry Klobutcher & Carolyn Jahn
butcher@PANDA.UCHC.EDU
, jahn@CASBAH.ACNS.NWU.EDU
-
Signal transduction: Todd Hennessey, thennes@ACSU.BUFFALO.EDU
-
Pharmacology: Bob Jacobs, rsjacobs@chem.ucsb.edu
-
Medical, public health, agriculture implications: Ted Clark, tgc3@CORNELL.EDU
-
Cell physiology and metabolic pathways: Volunteer needed
-
Development & Evo-Devo: Eric Cole & Marty Gorovsky,
colee@STOLAF.EDU
, goro@UHURA.CC.ROCHESTER.EDU
-
MAC/MIC, mitosis, meiosis: Kathy Karrer, karrerk@VMS.CSD.MU.EDU
-
Ecology: Paul Doerder, f.doerder@CSUOHIO.EDU
-
Environment: Terry Schultz & Juan Carlos Gutierrez, tschultz@utk.edu ,
-
Other areas: Paragraphs welcome
<End
of the report>